dieser
dieses
doch
dort
durch
ein
eine
einem
einen
einer
eines
einig
einige
einigem
einigen
einiger
einiges
einmal
er
ihn
ihm
es
etwas
euer
eure
eurem
euren
eurer
eures
für
gegen
gewesen
hab
habe
haben
hat
hatte
hatten
hier
hin
hinter
ich
mich
mir
ihr
ihre
ihrem
ihren
ihrer
ihres
euch

de ",groupCheckedEnd:" sélection(s)",badCreditCard:"Vous avez saisi un numéro de carte de crédit invalide",badCVV:"Vous avez saisi un CVV incorrect",wrongFileDim:"Mauvaise taille de l'image, ",imageTooTall:"l'image ne peut pas être plus élevée que",imageTooWide:"l'image ne peut pas être plus large que",imageTooSmall:"l'image est trop petite",min:"moins",max:"max",imageRatioNotAccepted:"Ratio de l'image non accepté"}})}(a,window)});...

    latch = new CountDownLatch(1);
    future = createListenableFuture(Boolean.TRUE, null, latch);
  }

  @Override
  protected void tearDown() throws Exception {

    // Make sure we have no waiting threads.
    latch.countDown();
  }

  /** Constructs a listenable future with a value available after the latch has counted down. */
  protected abstract <V> ListenableFuture<V> createListenableFuture(

    // make sure that no exception is thrown regardless of value of
    // 'swallowException' when the mock does not throw an exception.
    setupCloseable(false);
    doClose(mockCloseable, false, false);

    setupCloseable(false);
    doClose(mockCloseable, true, false);
  }

  public void testClose_closeableWithEatenException() throws IOException {

 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a

forking the repository and sending a pull request.

When submitting code, please make every effort to follow existing conventions
and style in order to keep the code as readable as possible. Please also make
sure your code compiles by running `./gradlew check`. Checkstyle failures
during compilation indicate errors in your style and can be viewed in the
`checkstyle-result.xml` file.

Some general advice

   * may expand in the future.
   */
  fun initialize(applicationContext: Context) {
    if (PlatformRegistry.applicationContext == null) {
      // Make sure we aren't using an Activity or Service Context
      PlatformRegistry.applicationContext = applicationContext.applicationContext
    }
  }

    write(out, data, 0, 100, true);
    File file = out.getFile();
    assertEquals(100, file.length());
    assertTrue(file.exists());
    out.close();

    // Make sure that finalize deletes the file
    out = null;

    // times out and throws RuntimeException on failure
    GcFinalization.awaitDone(
        new GcFinalization.FinalizationPredicate() {
          @Override

    /*
     * Since we use AtomicReferenceFieldUpdaterAtomicHelper by default, we'll "obviously" use it
     * even when Unsafe isn't available. But it's nice to have a check here to make sure that
     * nothing somehow goes wrong as the JDK restricts access to Unsafe.
     */
    checkHelperVersion(NO_UNSAFE, "AtomicReferenceFieldUpdaterAtomicHelper");
    /*

    assertTrue(iter.hasNext());
    assertTrue(iter.hasNext());
    assertTrue(iter.hasNext());
    assertEquals(1, (int) iter.next());

    assertFalse(iter.hasNext());

    // Make sure computeNext() doesn't get invoked again
    assertFalse(iter.hasNext());

    assertThrows(NoSuchElementException.class, iter::next);
  }

  public void testDefaultBehaviorOfPeek() {
    /*