return &Tokenizer{
		s:    &s,
		base: src.NewFileBase(name, objabi.AbsFile(objabi.WorkingDir(), name, *flags.TrimPath)),
		line: 1,
		file: file,
	}
}

// We want center dot (·) and division slash (∕) to work as identifier characters.
func isIdentRune(ch rune, i int) bool {
	if unicode.IsLetter(ch) {
		return true
	}
	switch ch {
	case '_': // Underscore; traditional.
		return true

		}
	}
}

type badExprTest struct {
	input string
	error string // Empty means no error.
}

var badExprTests = []badExprTest{
	{"0/0", "division by zero"},
	{"3/0", "division by zero"},
	{"(1<<63)/0", "divide of value with high bit set"},
	{"3%0", "modulo by zero"},
	{"(1<<63)%0", "modulo of value with high bit set"},
	{"3<<-4", "negative left shift count"},

 * <p>Note to maintainers: This implementation relies on signed arithmetic being bit-wise equivalent
 * to unsigned arithmetic in all cases except:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>comparisons (signed values can be negative)
 *   <li>division (avoided here)
 *   <li>shifting (right shift must be unsigned)
 * </ul>
 *
 * @author ******@****.*** (Kyle Maddison)
 * @author ******@****.*** (Geoff Pike)
 */
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

// MutatingWebhookConfiguration kubernetes object. This is exposed for
// integration tests only
type MutatingWebhookConfigInfo struct {
	Name     string `json:"name"`
	Revision string `json:"revision"`
	Tag      string `json:"tag,omitempty"`
}

// NsInfo represents namespace related information like pods running there.
// It is used to display data and is exposed for integration tests.
type NsInfo struct {

  xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 https://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
  <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
  <groupId>com.example.group</groupId>
  <artifactId>valid-version-revision</artifactId>
  <version>${revision}</version>

  <description>
    This will test if the validation for the ci friendly versions
    is working correct.
  </description>

* Google Docs is not a "code-oriented" tool, like asciidoc can be
* Review in Google Docs is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

The *Build Tool Team* has decided to use Architectural Decision Records (aka ADR) to track decisions we want to follow.

The main logic with ADRs is to describe (architectural) decisions made:

    return RANDOM_SOURCE.nextLong();
  }

  // A random value that cannot be 0 and that is unsigned-less-than or equal
  // to the given dividend, so that we don't have half of our divisions being
  // trivial because the divisor is bigger than the dividend.
  // Using remainder here does not give us a uniform distribution but it should
  // not have a big impact on the measurement.

    return RANDOM_SOURCE.nextLong();
  }

  // A random value that cannot be 0 and that is unsigned-less-than or equal
  // to the given dividend, so that we don't have half of our divisions being
  // trivial because the divisor is bigger than the dividend.
  // Using remainder here does not give us a uniform distribution but it should
  // not have a big impact on the measurement.

type ControlPlaneOptions struct {
	// Revision is the istio.io/rev control plane revision
	Revision string
}

// AttachControlPlaneFlags attaches control-plane flags to a Cobra command.
// (Currently just --revision)
func (o *ControlPlaneOptions) AttachControlPlaneFlags(cmd *cobra.Command) {
	cmd.PersistentFlags().StringVarP(&o.Revision, "revision", "r", "",
		"Control plane revision")

	return wh.ObjectMeta.Labels[label.IoIstioTag.Name]
}

// GetWebhookRevision extracts tag target revision from webhook object.
func GetWebhookRevision(wh admitv1.MutatingWebhookConfiguration) (string, error) {
	if tagName, ok := wh.ObjectMeta.Labels[label.IoIstioRev.Name]; ok {
		return tagName, nil
	}
	return "", fmt.Errorf("could not extract tag revision from webhook")
}

// DeleteTagWebhooks deletes the given webhooks.