final DerivationParameters param = new KDFCounterParameters(sessionKey, null /* prefix */, suffix /* suffix */, r /* r */);
        gen.init(param);

        final byte[] derived = new byte[16];
        gen.generateBytes(derived, 0, 16);
        return derived;
    }

    /**
     * @param string
     * @return null terminated ASCII bytes
     */
    private static byte[] toCBytes(final String string) {

    }
  }

  /**
   * Creates a suite whose map has some elements filtered out of view.
   *
   * <p>Because the map may be ascending or descending, this test must derive the relative order of
   * these extreme values rather than relying on their regular sort ordering.
   */
  final TestSuite createSubmapSuite(
      FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder<

    }

    return derivedSuites;
  }

  /**
   * Creates a suite whose set has some elements filtered out of view.
   *
   * <p>Because the set may be ascending or descending, this test must derive the relative order of
   * these extreme values rather than relying on their regular sort ordering.
   */
  final TestSuite createSubsetSuite(

    }

    return derivedSuites;
  }

  /**
   * Creates a suite whose set has some elements filtered out of view.
   *
   * <p>Because the set may be ascending or descending, this test must derive the relative order of
   * these extreme values rather than relying on their regular sort ordering.
   */
  final TestSuite createSubsetSuite(

          message.startsWith("Found resumable session") -> Type.Handshake
          message.startsWith("Resuming session") -> Type.Handshake
          message.startsWith("Using PSK to derive early secret") -> Type.Handshake
          else -> Type.Unknown
        }

    override fun toString(): String =
      if (param != null) {
        message + "\n" + param
      } else {
        message
      }

 * implement subtleties of the API improperly.
 *
 * <p><b>Custom implementation</b>: Avoid implementing {@code ListenableFuture} from scratch. If you
 * can't get by with the standard implementations, prefer to derive a new {@code Future} instance
 * with the methods in {@link Futures} or, if necessary, to extend {@link AbstractFuture}.
 *
 * <p>Occasionally, an API will return a plain {@code Future} and it will be impossible to change

 * implement subtleties of the API improperly.
 *
 * <p><b>Custom implementation</b>: Avoid implementing {@code ListenableFuture} from scratch. If you
 * can't get by with the standard implementations, prefer to derive a new {@code Future} instance
 * with the methods in {@link Futures} or, if necessary, to extend {@link AbstractFuture}.
 *
 * <p>Occasionally, an API will return a plain {@code Future} and it will be impossible to change

 * implement subtleties of the API improperly.
 *
 * <p><b>Custom implementation</b>: Avoid implementing {@code ListenableFuture} from scratch. If you
 * can't get by with the standard implementations, prefer to derive a new {@code Future} instance
 * with the methods in {@link Futures} or, if necessary, to extend {@link AbstractFuture}.
 *
 * <p>Occasionally, an API will return a plain {@code Future} and it will be impossible to change

    }
  }

  /**
   * Creates a suite whose map has some elements filtered out of view.
   *
   * <p>Because the map may be ascending or descending, this test must derive the relative order of
   * these extreme values rather than relying on their regular sort ordering.
   */
  final TestSuite createSubmapSuite(
      FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder<

        assertEquals(name, parsed.toString(), "toString should return the name");
        assertEquals(testOid().hashCode(), parsed.hashCode(), "hashCode should derive from OID");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Parses empty name length (NAME_LEN=0) as empty string")
    void parseEmptyName() {
        // Arrange
        String name = "";