public void close() throws IOException {
                super.close();
                counter[0]--;
              }
            };
          }
        };
    byte[] result = ByteSource.concat(checker, checker, checker).read();
    assertEquals(150, result.length);
  }

  private void joinHelper(Integer... spans) throws Exception {
    List<ByteSource> sources = new ArrayList<>();
    int start = 0;

not use beta APIs, unless you [repackage] them. **If your
code is a library, we strongly recommend using the [Guava Beta Checker] to
ensure that you do not use any `@Beta` APIs!**

[Guava Beta Checker]: https://github.com/google/guava-beta-checker

<!-- References -->

              public void close() throws IOException {
                super.close();
                counter[0]--;
              }
            };
          }
        };
    byte[] result = ByteSource.concat(checker, checker, checker).read();
    assertEquals(150, result.length);
  }

  private void joinHelper(Integer... spans) throws Exception {
    List<ByteSource> sources = new ArrayList<>();
    int start = 0;

[guava-snapshot-api-diffs]: https://guava.dev/releases/snapshot-jre/api/diffs/
[Guava Explained]: https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/Home
[Guava Beta Checker]: https://github.com/google/guava-beta-checker

<!-- References -->

[using Guava in your build]: https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/UseGuavaInYourBuild

    /*
     * We can't simply cast the result of `RegularImmutableMap.get` to V because of a bug in our
     * nullness checker (resulting from https://github.com/jspecify/checker-framework/issues/8).
     */
    if (result == null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      return (V) result;
    }
  }

  @Override

   * https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify-reference-checker/blob/61aafa4ae52594830cfc2d61c8b113009dbdb045/src/main/java/com/google/jspecify/nullness/NullSpecTransfer.java#L789
   * and https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/490.
   *
   * (Perhaps it should also have required that its cause was a RuntimeException. However, that
   * would have required that we throw a different kind of exception for wrapping *checked*

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},