Voici un petit bout de cette histoire.

## Alternatives

Je crée des API avec des exigences complexes depuis plusieurs années (Machine Learning, systèmes distribués, jobs asynchrones, bases de données NoSQL, etc), en dirigeant plusieurs équipes de développeurs.

Dans ce cadre, j'ai dû étudier, tester et utiliser de nombreuses alternatives.

L'histoire de **FastAPI** est en grande partie l'histoire de ses prédécesseurs.

Here's a little bit of that history.

## Alternatives

I have been creating APIs with complex requirements for several years (Machine Learning, distributed systems, asynchronous jobs, NoSQL databases, etc), leading several teams of developers.

As part of that, I needed to investigate, test and use many alternatives.

The history of **FastAPI** is in great part the history of its predecessors.

  && apt-get upgrade -y \
  && apt-get clean \
  && rm -rf  /var/log/*log /var/lib/apt/lists/* /var/log/apt/* /var/lib/dpkg/*-old /var/cache/debconf/*-old \
  && update-alternatives --set iptables /usr/sbin/iptables-legacy \
  && update-alternatives --set ip6tables /usr/sbin/ip6tables-legacy

# Sudoers used to allow tcpdump and other debug utilities.
RUN useradd -m --uid 1337 istio-proxy && \

**Describe the solution you'd like**
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

**Describe alternatives you've considered**
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

**Additional context**

about: Suggest an idea to improve Istio

---
(This is used to request new product features, please visit <https://github.com/istio/istio/discussions> for questions on using Istio)

**Describe the feature request**

**Describe alternatives you've considered**

**Affected product area (please put an X in all that apply)**

[ ] Ambient
[ ] Docs
[ ] Dual Stack
[ ] Installation
[ ] Networking
[ ] Performance and Scalability

      required: false
  - type: textarea
    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish? What other alternatives have you considered?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:

        #### Utility: compare with alternatives


        There is always *some* alternative to adding a new feature to Guava, even if it's just
        forking Guava yourself.


        We want to see that new features have some significant advantage over the alternatives.
        These advantages can take

Wie im Abschnitt [Alternativen](alternatives.md){.internal-link target=_blank} gesagt:

<blockquote markdown="1">

**FastAPI** würde ohne die frühere Arbeit anderer nicht existieren.

Es wurden zuvor viele Tools entwickelt, die als Inspiration für seine Entwicklung dienten.

   Therefore on any CPU that does not have these instruction sets, either CPU or GPU version of TF will fail to load.
   
   Apparently, your CPU model does not support AVX instruction sets. You can still use TensorFlow with the alternatives given below:
   
      * Try Google Colab to use TensorFlow.

- **Cross-Language Compatibility:**
Java serialization is inherently Java-centric and does not support cross-language scenarios well.

- **Type Safety:**
Java serialization does not enforce type safety as strictly as some alternatives, potentially leading to runtime errors.

## Decision

We do not use Java serialization.
Instead, we use custom serialization where we explicitly describe how data objects should be serialized and deserialized.