import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Simple benchmark: create, start, read. This does not currently report the most useful result
 * because it's ambiguous to what extent the stopwatch benchmark is being affected by GC.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class StopwatchBenchmark {
  @Benchmark
  long stopwatch(int reps) {
    long total = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {

        }
    }

    /**
     * Executes the update.
     *
     * @param ps
     *            {@link PreparedStatement}. Must not be {@literal null}.
     * @return The number of rows affected by the update.
     * @throws SQLRuntimeException
     *             If a {@link SQLException} occurs.
     */
    public static int executeUpdate(final PreparedStatement ps) throws SQLRuntimeException {

            Thread.interrupted();
            if (interruptingThread.isAlive()) {
              // This will be hidden by test-output redirection:
              logger.severe("InterruptenatorTask did not exit; future tests may be affected");
              /*
               * This won't do any good under JUnit 3, but I'll leave it around in
               * case we ever switch to JUnit 4:
               */
              fail();
            }

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Simple benchmark: create, start, read. This does not currently report the most useful result
 * because it's ambiguous to what extent the stopwatch benchmark is being affected by GC.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class StopwatchBenchmark {
  @Benchmark
  long stopwatch(int reps) {
    long total = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {

            Thread.interrupted();
            if (interruptingThread.isAlive()) {
              // This will be hidden by test-output redirection:
              logger.severe("InterruptenatorTask did not exit; future tests may be affected");
              /*
               * This won't do any good under JUnit 3, but I'll leave it around in
               * case we ever switch to JUnit 4:
               */
              fail();
            }

   * whether our solution scales to use with multiple exception types and to whether it is affected
   * by other {@code ClassValue} users. Some of the benchmarked implementations don't use one or
   * both of these mechanisms, so they will be unaffected.
   */
  @Param({"0", "1", "12"})
  int otherEntriesInDataStructure;

        // Messages should remain as provided
        assertEquals(message1, exception1.getMessage());
        assertEquals(message2, exception2.getMessage());

        // Messages should not be affected by cause
        assertFalse(exception1.getMessage().equals(exception2.getMessage()));
    }

    public void test_longMessage() {
        // Test with very long message

import java.util.Set;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class AbstractSetTester<E> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {
  /*

/**
 * Basic reserialization test for collections.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class CollectionSerializationTester<E> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {

 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class ListGetTester<E> extends AbstractListTester<E> {
  public void testGet_valid() {