t.Fatalf("rows affected expects: %v, got %v", 1, results.RowsAffected)
		} else if u1.ID == 0 {
			t.Fatalf("ID expects : not equal 0, got %v", u1.ID)
		}

		got := user{}
		results := DB.First(&got, "id = ?", u1.ID)
		if results.Error != nil {
			t.Fatalf("errors happened on first: %v", results.Error)
		} else if results.RowsAffected != 1 {
			t.Fatalf("rows affected expects: %v, got %v", 1, results.RowsAffected)

		t.Fatalf("Failed, got error: %v, rows affected: %v", result.Error, result.RowsAffected)
	}

	tx2 := db.Begin()
	if result := tx2.Where("name=?", "zzjin").Delete(&User{}); result.Error != nil || result.RowsAffected != 0 {
		t.Fatalf("Failed, got error: %v, rows affected: %v", result.Error, result.RowsAffected)
	}
	tx2.Commit()
}

        }
    }

    /**
     * Executes the update.
     *
     * @param ps
     *            {@link PreparedStatement}. Must not be {@literal null}.
     * @return The number of rows affected by the update.
     * @throws SQLRuntimeException
     *             If a {@link SQLException} occurs.
     */
    public static int executeUpdate(final PreparedStatement ps) throws SQLRuntimeException {

    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context (optional)
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Simple benchmark: create, start, read. This does not currently report the most useful result
 * because it's ambiguous to what extent the stopwatch benchmark is being affected by GC.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class StopwatchBenchmark {
  @Benchmark
  long stopwatch(int reps) {
    long total = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {

        Simple fixes in single PRs do not require issues. 
  
        **Do you use the latest project version?**

  - type: input
    id: version
    attributes:
      label: Affected version
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: message
    attributes:
      label: Bug description
    validations:

    validations:
      required: false
  - type: textarea
    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish? What other alternatives have you considered?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:

    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context (optional)
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:
      required: false
  - type: input
    id: page
    attributes:

<!--- and make sure you have followed https://github.com/minio/minio/tree/release/docs/debugging to capture relevant logs -->

1.
2.
3.
4.

## Context
<!--- How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish? -->
<!--- Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world -->

## Regression
<!-- Is this issue a regression? (Yes / No) -->

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Simple benchmark: create, start, read. This does not currently report the most useful result
 * because it's ambiguous to what extent the stopwatch benchmark is being affected by GC.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class StopwatchBenchmark {
  @Benchmark
  long stopwatch(int reps) {
    long total = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {