app = FastAPI(
    servers=[
        {"url": "/", "description": "Default, relative server"},
        {
            "url": "http://staging.localhost.tiangolo.com:8000",
            "description": "Staging but actually localhost still",
        },
        {"url": "https://prod.example.com"},
    ]
)


@app.get("/foo")
def foo():
    return {"message": "Hello World"}


client = TestClient(app)

      value: >
        #### Ubiquity: provide concrete use cases


        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this feature in a real-world scenario, or is it
        just a feature that seems like a sensible addition to Guava?


        Before new features get added to Guava, we really want to be sure that it's for a use case
        that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the real-world use case so the

     * Note that this operation is only concerned about determining the coordinates of the transitive dependencies and
     * does not actually resolve the artifact files.
     *
     * @param session the {@link Session}, must not be {@code null}
     * @param root the Maven Dependency, must not be {@code null}

```

////

The last `CommonQueryParams`, in:

```Python
... Depends(CommonQueryParams)
```

...is what **FastAPI** will actually use to know what is the dependency.

It is from this one that FastAPI will extract the declared parameters and that is what FastAPI will actually call.

---

In this case, the first `CommonQueryParams`, in:

//// tab | Python 3.9+

```Python

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure
        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the

### `scope` { #scope }

The spec also says that the client can send another form field "`scope`".

The form field name is `scope` (in singular), but it is actually a long string with "scopes" separated by spaces.

Each "scope" is just a string (without spaces).

They are normally used to declare specific security permissions, for example:

The webhooks that you define will end up in the **OpenAPI** schema and the automatic **docs UI**.

/// info

The `app.webhooks` object is actually just an `APIRouter`, the same type you would use when structuring your app with multiple files.

///

        }
        msg += ")";
        logger.debug(msg);
    }

    @Override
    public void manageArtifactVersion(Artifact artifact, Artifact replacement) {
        // only show msg if a change is actually taking place
        if (!replacement.getVersion().equals(artifact.getVersion())) {
            String msg = indent + artifact + " (applying version: " + replacement.getVersion() + ")";
            logger.debug(msg);

 * @see Artifact
 */
@Experimental
public interface LocalRepositoryManager extends Service {

    /**
     * Gets the relative path for a locally installed artifact.
     * Note that the artifact need not actually exist yet at
     * the returned location, the path merely indicates where
     * the artifact would eventually be stored.
     *
     * @param session The session to use, must not be {@code null}.

       changes with every test execution, such that running the test
       actually changes the test classpath itself. This means that it
       can"t benefit from incremental build acceleration, because on every
       execution it sees that the classpath has changed, and so to be
       safe, it needs to re-run.

       - This is unfortunate, because actually it would be safe to declare