}

	for i := 0; i < config.Toys; i++ {
		user.Toys = append(user.Toys, Toy{Name: name + "_toy_" + strconv.Itoa(i+1)})
	}

	for i := 0; i < config.Tools; i++ {
		user.Tools = append(user.Tools, Tools{Name: name + "_tool_" + strconv.Itoa(i+1)})
	}

	if config.Company {
		user.Company = Company{Name: "company-" + name}
	}

	if config.Manager {

import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Experimental;
import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Immutable;

/**
 * Represents most common tools supported by CLIng.
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Immutable
@Experimental
public final class Tools {
    private Tools() {}

    public static final String MVN_CMD = "mvn";
    public static final String MVN_NAME = "Maven";

## Tools {#tools}

### Go command {#go-command}

<!-- go.dev/issue/74667 -->
`cmd/doc`, and `go tool doc` have been deleted. `go doc` can be used as
a replacement for `go tool doc`: it takes the same flags and arguments and
has the same behavior.

## Tools {#tools}

### Go command {#go-command}

Guillaume Nodet <******@****.***> 1729859506 +0200

Wenn Sie sich die Benchmarks ansehen, werden häufig mehrere Tools mit unterschiedlichen Eigenschaften als gleichwertig verglichen.

Konkret geht es darum, Uvicorn, Starlette und FastAPI miteinander zu vergleichen (neben vielen anderen Tools).

Je einfacher das Problem, welches durch das Tool gelöst wird, desto besser ist die Performanz. Und die meisten Benchmarks testen nicht die zusätzlichen Funktionen, welche das Tool bietet.

Die Hierarchie ist wie folgt:

     *
     * @return the toolchain model
     */
    ToolchainModel getModel();

    /**
     * Gets the platform tool executable.
     *
     * @param toolName the tool platform independent tool name
     * @return file representing the tool executable, or null if the tool cannot be found
     */
    String findTool(String toolName);

    /**
     * Let the toolchain decide if it matches requirements defined

 *   <li>Master password management</li>
 *   <li>Security settings configuration</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVNENC_CMD
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVNENC_NAME
 * @since 4.0.0
 */

 *   <li>Dependency version management</li>
 *   <li>Configuration migration</li>
 *   <li>Interactive upgrade workflows</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVNUP_CMD
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVNUP_NAME
 * @since 4.0.0
 */

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server