### Same Schema for Input and Output Models in Docs { #same-schema-for-input-and-output-models-in-docs }

And now there will be one single schema for input and output for the model, only `Item`, and it will have `description` as **not required**:

<div class="screenshot">
<img src="/img/tutorial/separate-openapi-schemas/image05.png">
</div>

///

### JSON Schema's `examples` field { #json-schemas-examples-field }

But then JSON Schema added an <a href="https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.5" class="external-link" target="_blank">`examples`</a> field to a new version of the specification.

And then the new OpenAPI 3.1.0 was based on the latest version (JSON Schema 2020-12) that included this new field `examples`.

<div class="screenshot">
<img src="/img/tutorial/separate-openapi-schemas/image03.png">
</div>

### Eingabe- und Ausgabemodell in der Dokumentation

Und wenn Sie alle verfügbaren Schemas (JSON-Schemas) in OpenAPI überprüfen, werden Sie feststellen, dass es zwei gibt, ein `Item-Input` und ein `Item-Output`.

<div class="screenshot">
<img src="/img/tutorial/separate-openapi-schemas/image03.png">
</div>

### Modelo para Entrada e Saída na Documentação

E se você verificar todos os Schemas disponíveis (JSON Schemas) no OpenAPI, verá que há dois, um `Item-Input` e um `Item-Output`.

Para `Item-Input`, `description` **não é obrigatório**, não tem um asterisco vermelho.

<div class="screenshot">
<img src="/img/tutorial/separate-openapi-schemas/image03.png">
</div>

### Modelo para Entrada y Salida en la Documentación

Y si revisas todos los esquemas disponibles (JSON Schemas) en OpenAPI, verás que hay dos, uno `Item-Input` y uno `Item-Output`.

Para `Item-Input`, `description` **no es requerido**, no tiene un asterisco rojo.

O **JSON Schema** na verdade não tem um campo `example` nos padrões. Versões recentes do JSON Schema definem um campo <a href="https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.5" class="external-link" target="_blank">`examples`</a>, mas o OpenAPI 3.0.3 é baseado numa versão mais antiga do JSON Schema que não tinha `examples`.

## 技術詳細

`example` と `examples`について...

JSON Schemaの最新バージョンでは<a href="https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.5" class="external-link" target="_blank">`examples`</a>というフィールドを定義していますが、OpenAPIは`examples`を持たない古いバージョンのJSON Schemaをベースにしています。

Поля `example` как такового не существует в стандартах **JSON Schema**. В последних версиях JSON-схемы определено поле <a href="https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.5" class="external-link" target="_blank">`examples`</a>, но OpenAPI 3.0.3 основан на более старой версии JSON-схемы, которая не имела поля `examples`.

& 👈 **🎻 🔗** Pydantic 🏷 🔌 **🗄** 👆 🛠️, & ⤴️ ⚫️ ⚙️ 🩺 🎚.

**🎻 🔗** 🚫 🤙 ✔️ 🏑 `example` 🐩. ⏮️ ⏬ 🎻 🔗 🔬 🏑 <a href="https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.5" class="external-link" target="_blank">`examples`</a>, ✋️ 🗄 3️⃣.0️⃣.3️⃣ ⚓️ 🔛 🗝 ⏬ 🎻 🔗 👈 🚫 ✔️ `examples`.

                "application/json": {
                    "schema": {
                        "$ref": "#/components/schemas/HTTPValidationError"
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }
}
```

Les schémas sont référencés à un autre endroit du modèle OpenAPI :

```JSON hl_lines="4-16"
{
    "components": {
        "schemas": {
            "Message": {
                "title": "Message",