- type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: 1. What are you trying to do?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: 2. What's the best code you can write to accomplish that without the new feature?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: 3. What would that same code look like if we added your feature?
    validations:

-->

#### What type of PR is this?

<!--
Add one of the following kinds:
/kind bug
/kind cleanup
/kind documentation
/kind feature

Optionally add one or more of the following kinds if applicable:
/kind api-change
/kind deprecation
/kind failing-test
/kind flake
/kind regression
-->

#### What this PR does / why we need it:

        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our
        users indicates that they really appreciate Guava's high power-to-weight ratio. It's
        important to us to keep Guava as easy to use and understand as we can. That means boiling
        features down to compact but powerful abstractions, and controlling feature bloat carefully.

  - type: textarea
    attributes:

name: Bug Report
description: Report a bug encountered while operating Kubernetes
labels: kind/bug
body:
  - type: textarea
    id: problem
    attributes:
      label: What happened?
      description: |
        Please provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner.
        If this matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security
    validations:

 * iterator} method only once, and should be tested using this class. Exceptions to this rule should
 * be clearly documented.
 *
 * <p>Note that although your APIs should be liberal in what they accept, your methods which
 * <i>return</i> iterables should make every attempt to return ones of the robust variety.
 *
 * <p>This testing utility is not thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: Expected Behavior
      description: What did you expect to happen?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: Actual Behavior
      description: What actually happened?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: dropdown
    attributes:
      label: Packages

**Describe the bug**
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

**To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1. Go to '...'
2. Click on '....'
3. Scroll down to '....'
4. See error

**Expected behavior**
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

**Screenshots**
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

 * iterator} method only once, and should be tested using this class. Exceptions to this rule should
 * be clearly documented.
 *
 * <p>Note that although your APIs should be liberal in what they accept, your methods which
 * <i>return</i> iterables should make every attempt to return ones of the robust variety.
 *
 * <p>This testing utility is not thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion

labels: kind/feature
body:
  - type: textarea
    id: feature
    attributes:
      label: What would you like to be added?
      description: |
        Feature requests are unlikely to make progress as issues. Please consider engaging with SIGs on slack and mailing lists, instead.
        A proposal that works through the design along with the implications of the change can be opened as a KEP.

import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Signifies that a test should not be run under Android. This annotation is respected only by our
 * Google-internal Android suite generators. Note that those generators also suppress any test
 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *