{"TEXT", "foo<ABIInternal>(SB),0", "ABI selector only permitted when compiling runtime, reference was to \"foo\""},
		{"FUNCDATA", "", "expect two operands for FUNCDATA"},
		{"FUNCDATA", "(SB ", "expect two operands for FUNCDATA"},
		{"DATA", "", "expect two operands for DATA"},
		{"DATA", "0", "expect two operands for DATA"},
		{"DATA", "(0), 1", "expect /size for DATA argument"},
		{"DATA", "@B(SB)/4,0", "expected '(', found B"}, // Issue 23580.

       the task as up-to-date, because these two files, which are based on
       the generated index.xml, are outputs, not inputs. We can be sure of
       this because they are deleted in the @BeforeEach method of the
       OsgiTest test class.

       - To enable the benefit of incremental builds, we can ask Gradle
       to ignore these two files when considering whether the classpath

   * the edge connecting the two nodes.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Nullable V removeSuccessor(N node);

  /**
   * Add {@code node} as a predecessor to the origin node. In the case of an undirected graph, it
   * also becomes a successor. Associates {@code value} with the edge connecting the two nodes.
   */
  void addPredecessor(N node, V value);

  /**

/**
 * An object representing the differences between two maps.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 2.0
 */
@DoNotMock("Use Maps.difference")
@GwtCompatible
public interface MapDifference<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object> {
  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if there are no differences between the two maps; that is, if the maps are
   * equal.
   */
  boolean areEqual();

one:
	RET
TEXT ·a11(SB), 0, $0-0
	CMPL runtime·writeBarrier(SB), $0
	JEQ one
	JMP two
one:
	ORQ R15, R15 // ERROR "when dynamic linking, R15 is clobbered by a global variable access and is used here"
two:
	RET
TEXT ·a12(SB), 0, $0-0
	CMPL runtime·writeBarrier(SB), $0
	JMP one
two:
	ORQ R15, R15
	RET
one:
	MOVL $0, R15
	JMP two

// Ensure 3-arg instructions get GOT-rewritten without errors.
// See issue 58735.

	if len(users1) != 2 {
		t.Errorf("Should found two users's name in 1, 2, but got %v", len(users1))
	}

	DB.Scopes(NameIn1And2, NameIn2And3).Find(&users2)
	if len(users2) != 1 {
		t.Errorf("Should found one user's name is 2, but got %v", len(users2))
	}

	DB.Scopes(NameIn([]string{users[0].Name, users[2].Name})).Find(&users3)
	if len(users3) != 2 {
		t.Errorf("Should found two users's name in 1, 3, but got %v", len(users3))
	}

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one