* Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a2n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0

            performanceSubProject = "performance",
            bucketIndex = bucketIndex,
            extraParameters = "--profiler $profiler --tests \"${performanceScenario.scenario.className}.${performanceScenario.scenario.scenario}\"",

abstract class AdHocPerformanceScenario(os: Os, arch: Arch = Arch.AMD64) : BuildType({
    val id = "Util_Performance_AdHocPerformanceScenario${os.asName()}${arch.asName()}"
    name = "AdHoc Performance Scenario - ${os.asName()} ${arch.asName()}"
    id(id)

    applyPerformanceTestSettings(os = os, arch = arch, timeout = 420)
    artifactRules = individualPerformanceTestArtifactRules

    params {
        text(

        get() = PerformanceTestType.adHoc

    override
    val failsStage: Boolean
        get() = false

    val buildSpecs: List<FlameGraphGenerationBuildSpec>
        get() = scenarios.flatMap { scenario ->
            Os.values().flatMap { os ->
                val arch = if (os == Os.MACOS) Arch.AARCH64 else Arch.AMD64
                if (os == Os.WINDOWS) {
                    listOf("jprofiler")

     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0

     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0

     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0

          maxSize = 50L * 1024L * 1024L // 50 MiB
      ))
      .build()
```

## EventListener events 

Cache Events are exposed via the EventListener API.  Typical scenarios are below.

### Cache Hit

In the ideal scenario the cache can fulfill the request without any conditional call to the network.
This will skip the normal events such as DNS, connecting to the network, and downloading the response body.

are skipped, and any checks implemented inside the shape inference code are not
executed.

The security impact of skipping those checks should be low, since the attack
scenario would require a malicious user to be able to control the model which as
stated above is already equivalent to code execution. In any case, the
recommendation is not to serve models using Eager mode since it also has

// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.

package compare

import (
	"bytes"
	"os"
	"testing"
)

// TestComparatorMatchingConfigs tests the scenario where Istiod and Envoy configurations match
func TestComparatorMatchingSameConfigs(t *testing.T) {
	cfg, err := os.ReadFile("testdata/configdump.json")
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("Failed to read test data: %v", err)
	}