* second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *

 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *

        // This test assumes that the AvPair constructor does NOT make a defensive copy of the raw array.
        // If a defensive copy were made, this test would fail, and the behavior would be more robust.
        // Given the current implementation, direct modification of the passed array affects the AvPair.
        // If this is not desired, a defensive copy should be added in the AvPair constructor.

In a typical modern infrastructure deployment, application, database, key-store, etc. already live in containers and are managed by orchestration platforms. MinIO brings robust, scalable, AWS S3 compatible object storage to the lot.

These guidelines ensure high-quality commits in MinIO’s GitHub repositories, maintaining 
a clear, valuable commit history for our open-source projects. They apply to all contributors, 
fostering efficient reviews and robust code.

## Why Pull Requests?

Pull Requests (PRs) drive quality in MinIO’s codebase by:
- Enabling peer review without pair programming.
- Documenting changes for future reference.

        // but we can check that it's not zero.
        long writtenTime = SMBUtil.readInt4(dst, 2) & 0xFFFFFFFFL;
        // This is a weak check, but better than nothing.
        // A more robust test would require a real SMB1SigningDigest.
        assertTrue(writtenTime != 0 || lastWriteTime == 0);
    }

    /**

    * **Einfach**: Einfach zu bedienen und zu erlernen. Weniger Zeit für das Lesen von Dokumentationen.
    * **Kurz**: Codeverdoppelung minimieren. Mehrere Funktionalitäten aus jeder Parameterdeklaration.
    * **Robust**: Erhalten Sie produktionsbereiten Code. Mit automatischer, interaktiver Dokumentation.

But keep in mind that, as everything is handled in memory, in a single list, it will only work while the process is running, and will only work with a single process.

If you need something easy to integrate with FastAPI but that is more robust, supported by Redis, PostgreSQL or others, check <a href="https://github.com/encode/broadcaster" class="external-link" target="_blank">encode/broadcaster</a>.

///

## More info { #more-info }

* Validation for more exotic types, like:
    * URL.
    * Email.
    * UUID.
    * ...and others.

All the validation is handled by the well-established and robust **Pydantic**.

### Security and authentication { #security-and-authentication }

Security and authentication integrated. Without any compromise with databases or data models.

Se você precisa de algo fácil de integrar com o FastAPI, mas que seja mais robusto, suportado por Redis, PostgreSQL ou outros, verifique o <a href="https://github.com/encode/broadcaster" class="external-link" target="_blank">encode/broadcaster</a>.

///

## Mais informações