assertEquals("B", peekingIterator.next());
    peekingIterator.remove();
    assertEquals("Should have removed an element", 2, list.size());
    assertFalse("Second element should be gone", list.contains("B"));
  }

  static class ThrowsAtEndException extends RuntimeException {
    /* nothing */
  }

  /**

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    maxIdleConnections: Int = 5,
    keepAliveDuration: Long = 5,
    timeUnit: TimeUnit = TimeUnit.MINUTES,
    taskRunner: TaskRunner = TaskRunner.INSTANCE,
    connectionListener: ConnectionListener = ConnectionListener.NONE,
    readTimeoutMillis: Int = 10_000,
    writeTimeoutMillis: Int = 10_000,
    socketConnectTimeoutMillis: Int = 10_000,
    socketReadTimeoutMillis: Int = 10_000,
    pingIntervalMillis: Int = 10_000,

-->

#### What type of PR is this?

<!--
Add one of the following kinds:
/kind bug
/kind cleanup
/kind documentation
/kind feature

Optionally add one or more of the following kinds if applicable:
/kind api-change
/kind deprecation
/kind failing-test
/kind flake
/kind regression
-->

   */
  private val tcpConnectsInFlight = CopyOnWriteArrayList<Plan>()

  /**
   * Results are posted here as they occur. The find job is done when either one plan completes
   * successfully or all plans fail.
   */
  private val connectResults = taskRunner.backend.decorate(LinkedBlockingDeque<ConnectResult>())

  override fun find(): RealConnection {