copy(shiftedB, tt.b)
			cmp := Compare(tt.a, shiftedB)
			if cmp != tt.i {
				t.Errorf(`Compare(%q, %q), offset %d = %v; want %v`, tt.a, tt.b, offset, cmp, tt.i)
			}
		}
	}
}

func TestCompareIdenticalSlice(t *testing.T) {
	var b = []byte("Hello Gophers!")
	if Compare(b, b) != 0 {
		t.Error("b != b")
	}
	if Compare(b, b[:1]) != 1 {
		t.Error("b > b[:1] failed")
	}
}

        if (i2 == -1) {
            // first one is known, so it comes first
            return -1;
        }
        int rv = Integer.compare(i1, i2);
        if (rv != 0) {
            return rv;
        }
        // same execution point, now compare priorities
        return Integer.compare(p1.priority(), p2.priority());
    }

                .compare(1.0, 1.0)
                .compare(1.0f, 1.0f)
                .compare("a", "a", Ordering.usingToString())
                .result())
        .isEqualTo(0);
  }

  public void testShortCircuitLess() {
    assertThat(
            ComparisonChain.start()
                .compare("a", "b")
                .compare(DONT_COMPARE_ME, DONT_COMPARE_ME)
                .result())

  }

  @Benchmark
  void longEqualJava(int reps) {
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; ++i) {
      if (javaImpl.compare(ba1, ba2) != 0) {
        throw new Error(); // deoptimization
      }
    }
  }

  @Benchmark
  void longEqualUnsafe(int reps) {
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; ++i) {
      if (unsafeImpl.compare(ba1, ba2) != 0) {
        throw new Error(); // deoptimization
      }
    }
  }

  @Benchmark

#### Fix it with `secrets.compare_digest()` { #fix-it-with-secrets-compare-digest }

But in our code we are actually using `secrets.compare_digest()`.

In short, it will take the same time to compare `stanleyjobsox` to `stanleyjobson` than it takes to compare `johndoe` to `stanleyjobson`. And the same for the password.

        assertEquals(
            ORDERING.compare(i, 3) < 0 || (ORDERING.compare(i, 3) == 0 && lBoundType == CLOSED),
            range.contains(i));
        assertEquals(
            ORDERING.compare(i, 3) > 0 || (ORDERING.compare(i, 3) == 0 && lBoundType == OPEN),
            range.tooHigh(i));
        assertFalse(range.tooLow(i));
      }
    }
  }

  public void testDoublyBoundedAgainstRange() {

## Benchmarks and speed { #benchmarks-and-speed }

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

		{cred, cred, true},
		// Empty credentials to compare.
		{cred, Credentials{}, false},
		// Empty credentials.
		{Credentials{}, cred, false},
		// Two different credentialss
		{cred, cred2, false},
		// Access key is different in credentials to compare.
		{cred, Credentials{AccessKey: "myuser", SecretKey: cred.SecretKey}, false},
		// Secret key is different in credentials to compare.

        assertEquals(
            ORDERING.compare(i, 3) < 0 || (ORDERING.compare(i, 3) == 0 && lBoundType == CLOSED),
            range.contains(i));
        assertEquals(
            ORDERING.compare(i, 3) > 0 || (ORDERING.compare(i, 3) == 0 && lBoundType == OPEN),
            range.tooHigh(i));
        assertFalse(range.tooLow(i));
      }
    }
  }

  public void testDoublyBoundedAgainstRange() {

          .isTrue();
    }
  }

  public void testCompare() {
    for (byte x : VALUES) {
      for (byte y : VALUES) {
        // Only compare the sign of the result of compare().
        int expected = Byte.compare(x, y);
        int actual = SignedBytes.compare(x, y);
        if (expected == 0) {
          assertWithMessage("%s, %s", x, y).that(actual).isEqualTo(expected);
        } else if (expected < 0) {