* annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a

    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_PUT)
  public void testReplaceEntry_unsupportedAbsentKey() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(k3(), v3(), v4());
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();

    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_PUT)
  public void testReplaceEntry_unsupportedAbsentKey() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(k3(), v3(), v4());
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();

    if (value < 0) {
      throw new IllegalArgumentException(name + " cannot be negative but was: " + value);
    }
    return value;
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static long checkNonnegative(long value, String name) {
    if (value < 0) {
      throw new IllegalArgumentException(name + " cannot be negative but was: " + value);
    }
    return value;
  }

  static void checkPositive(int value, String name) {

    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_PUT)
  public void testReplaceEntry_unsupportedAbsentKey() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(k3(), v3(), v4());
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();

    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_PUT)
  public void testReplaceEntry_unsupportedAbsentKey() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(k3(), v3(), v4());
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();

        /* windows98 has what appears to be another 4 0's followed by the share
         * name as a zero terminated ascii string "\TMP" + '\0'
         *
         * As is this works, but it deviates from the spec section 4.1.6.6 but
         * maybe I should put it in. Wonder what NT does?
         */

        return dstIndex - start;
    }

    @Override
    int writeDataWireFormat(final byte[] dst, final int dstIndex) {

  }
}
```

This is implemented using `suspendCancellableCoroutine`
but uses the standard Dispatcher in OkHttp. This means
that by default Kotlin's Dispatchers are not used.

Cancellation if implemented sensibly in both directions.
Cancelling a coroutine scope, will cancel the call.
Cancelling a call, will throw a CancellationException

        #  (so the tables are not existing in SchemaHTML and HistoryHTML and so on).
        #  But you can specify the '@gen' suffix that means generate-only except.
        #  A table with the mark can be treated as documents but no generating classes.
        #
        #; tableExceptList = list:{FOO_TABLE@gen ; prefix:FOO_@gen ; suffix:_FOO ; contain:_FOO_}

     * the full DOMAIN\name form of the account will be
     * returned (e.g. MYDOM\alice or MYDOM\Domain Users).
     * If the SID has been resolved but it is is a domain SID,
     * only the domain name will be returned (e.g. MYDOM).
     * If the SID has been resolved but it is a builtin account,
     * only the name component will be returned (e.g. SYSTEM).
     * If the sid cannot be resolved the numeric representation from