assertEquals(pair.forward, copy.forward);
    assertEquals(pair.backward, copy.backward);
    assertSame(copy.backward, copy.forward.inverse());
    assertSame(copy.forward, copy.backward.inverse());
  }

  private static class BiMapPair<K, V> implements Serializable {
    final BiMap<K, V> forward;
    final BiMap<V, K> backward;

    BiMapPair(BiMap<K, V> original) {
      this.forward = original;

          public Integer apply(String input) {
            return Integer.parseInt(input);
          }
        };
    Function<Object, String> backward = toStringFunction();

    Converter<String, Number> converter = Converter.<String, Number>from(forward, backward);

    assertNull(converter.convert(null));
    assertNull(converter.reverse().convert(null));

    assertEquals((Integer) 5, converter.convert("5"));

  // +optional
  optional string type = 11;

  // deprecatedSource is the deprecated field assuring backward compatibility with core.v1 Event type.
  // +optional
  optional k8s.io.api.core.v1.EventSource deprecatedSource = 12;

  // deprecatedFirstTimestamp is the deprecated field assuring backward compatibility with core.v1 Event type.
  // +optional

  optional string type = 11;

  // deprecatedSource is the deprecated field assuring backward compatibility with core.v1 Event type.
  // +optional
  optional k8s.io.api.core.v1.EventSource deprecatedSource = 12;

  // deprecatedFirstTimestamp is the deprecated field assuring backward compatibility with core.v1 Event type.
  // +optional

      options:
        - label: "Has this idea, or one like it, been proposed before?"
        - label: "Does this affect error handling?"
        - label: "Is this about generics?"
        - label: "Is this change backward compatible? Breaking the Go 1 compatibility guarantee is a large cost and requires a large benefit"

  - type: textarea
    id: related-proposals
    attributes:

Yes, MinIO will try to transparently migrate any existing IAM data and either stores
it in plaintext (no KMS) or re-encrypts using the KMS.

> Is this change backward compatible? Will it break my setup?

This change is not backward compatible for all setups. In particular, the native
Hashicorp Vault integration - which has been deprecated already - won't be

// - total size of the bucket
// - total objects in a bucket
// - object size histogram per bucket
type BucketUsageInfo struct {
	Size uint64 `json:"size"`
	// Following five fields suffixed with V1 are here for backward compatibility
	// Total Size for objects that have not yet been replicated
	ReplicationPendingSizeV1 uint64 `json:"objectsPendingReplicationTotalSize"`

            }
        }

        RemoteRepository remoteRepo = RepositoryUtils.toRepo(deploymentRepository);
        /*
         * NOTE: This provides backward-compat with maven-deploy-plugin:2.4 which bypasses the repository factory when
         * using an alternative deployment location.
         */
        if (deploymentRepository instanceof DefaultArtifactRepository

	}
}

// TLSCiphersBackwardCompatible returns a list of supported
// TLS transport cipher suite IDs.
//
// In contrast to TLSCiphers, the list contains additional
// ciphers for backward compatibility. In particular, AES-CBC
// and non-ECDHE ciphers.
func TLSCiphersBackwardCompatible() []uint16 {
	if Enabled {
		return []uint16{
			tls.TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256, // TLS 1.3
			tls.TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,

        public boolean isCache() {
            for (final String value : values) {
                if ("cache".equalsIgnoreCase(value)) {
                    return true;
                }
            }
            // backward compatibility
            if (values.length == 1 && Constants.TRUE.equalsIgnoreCase(values[0])) {
                return true;
            }
            return false;
        }

        public boolean isOverwrite() {