}
        };

    final SimpleTearDown tearDownTwo = new SimpleTearDown(callback);
    stack.addTearDown(tearDownTwo);

    assertEquals(false, tearDownOne.ran);
    assertEquals(false, tearDownTwo.ran);

    stack.runTearDown();

    assertEquals("tearDownOne should have run", true, tearDownOne.ran);

          }
        };

    final SimpleTearDown tearDownTwo = new SimpleTearDown(callback);
    stack.addTearDown(tearDownTwo);

    assertEquals(false, tearDownOne.ran);
    assertEquals(false, tearDownTwo.ran);

    stack.runTearDown();

    assertEquals("tearDownOne should have run", true, tearDownOne.ran);

somos
sois
son
sea
seas
seamos
seáis
sean
seré
serás
será
seremos
seréis
serán
sería
serías
seríamos
seríais
serían
era
eras
éramos
erais
eran
fui
fuiste
fue
fuimos
fuisteis
fueron
fuera
fueras
fuéramos
fuerais
fueran
fuese
fueses
fuésemos
fueseis
fuesen
siendo
sido
tengo
tienes

# Enlaces Externos y Artículos

**FastAPI** tiene una gran comunidad en constante crecimiento.

Hay muchas publicaciones, artículos, herramientas y proyectos relacionados con **FastAPI**.

Aquí hay una lista incompleta de algunos de ellos.

!!! tip "Consejo"

https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/devel/sig-release/release.md#issuepr-kind-label
3. Ensure you have added or ran the appropriate tests for your PR: https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/devel/sig-testing/testing.md

# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
# ==============================================================================
cat <<EOF
IMPORTANT: These tests ran under docker. This script does not clean up the
container for you! You can delete the container with:

$ docker rm -f tf

You can also execute more commands within the container with e.g.:

$ docker exec tf bazel clean

 * approach but with a subclass rather than a superclass.
 *
 * <p>TODO(cpovirk): Consider applying this subclass approach to our other types.
 *
 * <p>For {@code ImmutableMultiset} in particular, I ran into a problem with the {@code
 * GwtSerializationDependencies} approach: When autogenerating a serializer for the new class, GWT
 * tries to refer to our dummy serializer for the superclass,

 * approach but with a subclass rather than a superclass.
 *
 * <p>TODO(cpovirk): Consider applying this subclass approach to our other types.
 *
 * <p>For {@code ImmutableMultiset} in particular, I ran into a problem with the {@code
 * GwtSerializationDependencies} approach: When autogenerating a serializer for the new class, GWT
 * tries to refer to our dummy serializer for the superclass,

  - family-names: Dean
    given-names: Jeffrey
  - family-names: Devin
    given-names: Matthieu
  - family-names: Ghemawat
    given-names: Sanjay
  - family-names: Goodfellow
    given-names: Ian
  - family-names: Harp
    given-names: Andrew
  - family-names: Irving
    given-names: Geoffrey
  - family-names: Isard
    given-names: Michael
  - family-names: Jozefowicz
    given-names: Rafal

          // If encoder underflows, it means either:
          // a) the final flush() succeeded; next drain (then done)
          // b) we encoded all of the input; next flush
          // c) we ran of out input to encode; next read more input
          if (doneEncoding) { // (a)
            doneFlushing = true;
            startDraining(false);
            continue DRAINING;
          } else if (endOfInput) { // (b)