* newHasher().putByte(b1).putBytes(new byte[] { b2, b3 }).hash()
 * newHasher().putBytes(new byte[] { b1, b2, b3 }).hash()
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>If you wish to avoid this, you should either prepend or append the size of each chunk. Keep in
 * mind that when dealing with char sequences, the encoded form of two concatenated char sequences
 * is not equivalent to the concatenation of their encoded form. Therefore, {@link

    System.arraycopy(second, 0, result, first.length, second.length);
    return result;
  }

  /**
   * Returns a new array that prepends {@code element} to {@code array}.
   *
   * @param element the element to prepend to the front of {@code array}
   * @param array the array of elements to append
   * @return an array whose size is one larger than {@code array}, with {@code element} occupying

 *
 * <p>Since the value collections are sets, the behavior of a {@code SetMultimap} is not specified
 * if key or value objects already present in the multimap change in a manner that affects
 * {@code equals} comparisons. Use caution if mutable objects are used as keys or values in a {@code
 * SetMultimap}.
 *

   * for an RPC may wait for a similar call that requests a long timeout, or a call by an
   * unprivileged user may return a resource accessible only to a privileged user making a similar
   * call. To prevent this problem, create a key object that includes all values that affect the
   * result of the query. Or use {@code LoadingCache.get(K)}, which lacks the ability to refer to
   * state other than that in the key.
   *

  @CheckForNull @LazyInit private List<@Nullable Present<V>> values;

  CollectionFuture(
      ImmutableCollection<? extends ListenableFuture<? extends V>> futures,
      boolean allMustSucceed) {
    super(futures, allMustSucceed, true);

    List<@Nullable Present<V>> values =
        futures.isEmpty()
            ? Collections.<@Nullable Present<V>>emptyList()
            : Lists.<@Nullable Present<V>>newArrayListWithCapacity(futures.size());

  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  public void testRemove_occurrences_present() {
    assertEquals(
        "multiset.remove(present, 2) didn't return the old count",
        1,
        getMultiset().remove(e0(), 2));
    assertFalse(
        "multiset contains present after multiset.remove(present, 2)",
        getMultiset().contains(e0()));
    assertEquals(0, getMultiset().count(e0()));
  }

  }

  @MapFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_PUT, SUPPORTS_REMOVE})
  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  public void testCompute_presentToPresent() {
    assertEquals(
        "Map.compute(present, functionReturningValue) should return new value",
        v3(),
        getMap()
            .compute(
                k0(),
                (k, v) -> {
                  assertEquals(k0(), k);

    E duplicate = arrayAndDuplicate.duplicate;

    int firstIndex = getList().indexOf(duplicate);
    int initialSize = getList().size();
    assertTrue("remove(present) should return true", getList().remove(duplicate));
    assertTrue(
        "After remove(duplicate), a list should still contain the duplicate element",
        getList().contains(duplicate));
    assertFalse(

                }));
    expectAdded(entry(null, v3()));
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_PUT)
  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  public void testMergePresent() {
    assertEquals(
        "Map.merge(present, value, function) should return function result",
        v4(),
        getMap()
            .merge(
                k0(),
                v3(),
                (oldV, newV) -> {

    contains com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture class, without
    any other Guava classes. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

    - If users want all of Guava, they depend on guava, which, as of Guava
    27.0, depends on
    listenablefuture-9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava. The 9999.0-...