Dans ce cadre, j'ai dû étudier, tester et utiliser de nombreuses alternatives.

L'histoire de **FastAPI** est en grande partie l'histoire de ses prédécesseurs.

Comme dit dans la section [Alternatives](alternatives.md){.internal-link target=\_blank} :

<blockquote markdown="1">

from fastapi.security import OAuth2PasswordBearer, OAuth2PasswordRequestForm
from jose import JWTError, jwt
from passlib.context import CryptContext
from pydantic import BaseModel

# to get a string like this run:
# openssl rand -hex 32
SECRET_KEY = "09d25e094faa6ca2556c818166b7a9563b93f7099f6f0f4caa6cf63b88e8d3e7"
ALGORITHM = "HS256"
ACCESS_TOKEN_EXPIRE_MINUTES = 30


fake_users_db = {
    "johndoe": {
        "username": "johndoe",

from jose import JWTError, jwt
from passlib.context import CryptContext
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing_extensions import Annotated

# to get a string like this run:
# openssl rand -hex 32
SECRET_KEY = "09d25e094faa6ca2556c818166b7a9563b93f7099f6f0f4caa6cf63b88e8d3e7"
ALGORITHM = "HS256"
ACCESS_TOKEN_EXPIRE_MINUTES = 30


fake_users_db = {
    "johndoe": {
        "username": "johndoe",

    Mas `open()` não usa `async` e `await`.

    Então, nós declaramos uma função de manipulação de evento com o padrão `def` ao invés de `async def`.

### `startup` e `shutdown` juntos

Há uma grande chance que a lógica para sua *inicialização* e *encerramento* esteja conectada, você pode querer iniciar alguma coisa e então finalizá-la, adquirir um recurso e então liberá-lo, etc.

from fastapi.security import OAuth2PasswordBearer, OAuth2PasswordRequestForm
from jose import JWTError, jwt
from passlib.context import CryptContext
from pydantic import BaseModel

# to get a string like this run:
# openssl rand -hex 32
SECRET_KEY = "09d25e094faa6ca2556c818166b7a9563b93f7099f6f0f4caa6cf63b88e8d3e7"
ALGORITHM = "HS256"
ACCESS_TOKEN_EXPIRE_MINUTES = 30


fake_users_db = {
    "johndoe": {
        "username": "johndoe",

)
from jose import JWTError, jwt
from passlib.context import CryptContext
from pydantic import BaseModel, ValidationError
from typing_extensions import Annotated

# to get a string like this run:
# openssl rand -hex 32
SECRET_KEY = "09d25e094faa6ca2556c818166b7a9563b93f7099f6f0f4caa6cf63b88e8d3e7"
ALGORITHM = "HS256"
ACCESS_TOKEN_EXPIRE_MINUTES = 30


fake_users_db = {
    "johndoe": {
        "username": "johndoe",

  social:
  - icon: fontawesome/brands/github-alt
    link: https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi
  - icon: fontawesome/brands/discord
    link: https://discord.gg/VQjSZaeJmf
  - icon: fontawesome/brands/twitter
    link: https://twitter.com/fastapi
  - icon: fontawesome/brands/linkedin
    link: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tiangolo
  - icon: fontawesome/brands/dev
    link: https://dev.to/tiangolo

Como parte disso, eu precisava investigar, testar e usar muitas alternativas.

A história do **FastAPI** é, em grande parte, a história de seus predecessores.

Como dito na seção [Alternativas](alternatives.md){.internal-link target=_blank}:

<blockquote markdown="1">

**FastAPI** não existiria se não pelo trabalho anterior de outros.

{% endfor %}

</div>
{% endif %}

## Principaux contributeurs

Ces utilisateurs sont les **Principaux contributeurs**. 👷

Ces utilisateurs ont [créé le plus grand nombre de demandes Pull Request](help-fastapi.md#creer-une-pull-request){.internal-link target=_blank} qui ont été *merged*.

Ils ont contribué au code source, à la documentation, aux traductions, etc. 📦

{% if people %}

  <div id="announce-left">
    <div class="item">
      <a class="announce-link" href="https://twitter.com/fastapi" target="_blank">
        <span class="twemoji twitter">
          {% include ".icons/fontawesome/brands/twitter.svg" %}
        </span> Follow <strong>@fastapi</strong> on <strong>Twitter</strong> to stay updated
      </a>
    </div>
    <div class="item">