* `@app.get()`
* `@app.post()`
* `@app.put()`
* `@app.delete()`
* usw.

```Python hl_lines="6"
{!../../../docs_src/response_status_code/tutorial001.py!}
```

!!! note "Hinweis"

与指定响应模型的方式相同，在以下任意*路径操作*中，可以使用 `status_code` 参数声明用于响应的 HTTP 状态码：

* `@app.get()`
* `@app.post()`
* `@app.put()`
* `@app.delete()`
* 等……

```Python hl_lines="6"
{!../../../docs_src/response_status_code/tutorial001.py!}
```

!!! note "笔记"

    注意，`status_code` 是（`get`、`post` 等）**装饰器**方法中的参数。与之前的参数和请求体不同，不是*路径操作函数*的参数。

`status_code` 参数接收表示 HTTP 状态码的数字。

!!! info "说明"

Anschließend können Sie den `status_code` in diesem *vorübergehenden* Response-Objekt festlegen.

```Python hl_lines="1  9  12"
{!../../../docs_src/response_change_status_code/tutorial001.py!}
```

Und dann können Sie wie gewohnt jedes benötigte Objekt zurückgeben (ein `dict`, ein Datenbankmodell usw.).

| `contact` | `dict` | 📧 ℹ 🎦 🛠️. ⚫️ 💪 🔌 📚 🏑. <details><summary><code>contact</code> 🏑</summary><table><thead><tr><th>🔢</th><th>🆎</th><th>📛</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><code>name</code></td><td><code>str</code></td><td>⚖ 📛 📧 👨‍💼/🏢.</td></tr><tr><td><code>url</code></td><td><code>str</code></td><td>📛 ☝ 📧 ℹ. 🔜 📁 📛.</td></tr><tr><td><code>email</code></td><td><code>str</code></td><td>📧 📢 📧 👨‍💼/🏢. 🔜 📁 📧 📢. </td></tr></tbody></table></details> |

    Type[BaseModel], Type[BaseModel]
] = WeakKeyDictionary()


def is_body_allowed_for_status_code(status_code: Union[int, str, None]) -> bool:
    if status_code is None:
        return True
    # Ref: https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/blob/main/versions/3.1.0.md#patterned-fields-1
    if status_code in {
        "default",
        "1XX",
        "2XX",
        "3XX",
        "4XX",
        "5XX",

    * Will have the best performance, as it doesn't have much extra code apart from the server itself.
    * You wouldn't write an application in Uvicorn directly. That would mean that your code would have to include more or less, at least, all the code provided by Starlette (or **FastAPI**). And if you did that, your final application would have the same overhead as having used a framework and minimizing your app code and bugs.

    assert response.status_code == 200
    assert response.json() == {
        "id": "foo",
        "title": "Foo",
        "description": "There goes my hero",
    }


def test_read_item_bad_token():
    response = client.get("/items/foo", headers={"X-Token": "hailhydra"})
    assert response.status_code == 400
    assert response.json() == {"detail": "Invalid X-Token header"}

    response = client.get("/items/", headers={"X-Token": "invalid"})
    assert response.status_code == 400, response.text
    assert response.json() == {"detail": "X-Token header invalid"}


def test_get_invalid_one_users():
    response = client.get("/users/", headers={"X-Token": "invalid"})
    assert response.status_code == 400, response.text
    assert response.json() == {"detail": "X-Token header invalid"}

    response = client.post("/login/", data={"username": "Foo", "password": "secret"})
    assert response.status_code == 200
    assert response.json() == {"username": "Foo"}


def test_post_body_form_no_password(client: TestClient):
    response = client.post("/login/", data={"username": "Foo"})
    assert response.status_code == 422
    assert response.json() == IsDict(
        {
            "detail": [
                {

        raise HTTPException(
            status_code=status.HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED,
            detail="Invalid authentication credentials",
            headers={"WWW-Authenticate": "Bearer"},
        )
    return user


async def get_current_active_user(
    current_user: Annotated[User, Depends(get_current_user)],
):
    if current_user.disabled:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Inactive user")
    return current_user