contains com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture class, without
    any other Guava classes. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

    - If users want all of Guava, they depend on guava, which, as of Guava
    27.0, depends on
    listenablefuture-9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava. The 9999.0-...

    assertFalse(listenableFuture.isDone());

    listenableFuture.addListener(singleCallListener, directExecutor());
    /*
     * Don't shut down until the listenInPoolThread task has been accepted to
     * run. We want to see what happens when it's interrupted, not when it's
     * rejected.
     */
    submitSuccessful.await();
    executorService.shutdownNow();
    abstractFuture.set(DATA1);

 */

package com.google.common.testing;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.util.logging.Level;
import java.util.logging.Logger;

/**
 * Simple utility for when you want to create a {@link TearDown} that may throw an exception but
 * should not fail a test when it does. (The behavior of a {@code TearDown} that throws an exception

import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * {@link FluentFuture} that forwards all calls to a delegate.
 *
 * <h3>Extension</h3>
 *
 * If you want a class like {@code FluentFuture} but with extra methods, we recommend declaring your
 * own subclass of {@link ListenableFuture}, complete with a method like {@link #from} to adapt an

 * presented below:
 *
 * <pre>
 * void runManyThings({@literal List<ThingToRun>} thingsToRun) {
 *   for (ThingToRun thingToRun : thingsToRun) {
 *     thingToRun.run(); // say this may throw an exception, but you want to
 *                       // always run all thingsToRun
 *   }
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>This is what the code would become:
 *
 * <pre>
 * void runManyThings({@literal List<ThingToRun>} thingsToRun) {

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>Important note:</b> the primary goal of this benchmark is to ensure that varying {@code
 * whereToDiffer} produces no observable change in performance. We want to make sure that the array
 * equals implementation is *not* short-circuiting to prevent timing-based attacks. Being fast is
 * only a secondary goal.
 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */
public class HashCodeBenchmark {

     * least old versions), so we mostly do. This is useful because we don't actually run our CI on
     * Windows under Java 8, at least as of this writing.
     *
     * Under Windows in particular, we want to test that:
     *
     * - Under Java 9+, createTempDir() succeeds because it can look up the *real* username, rather
     * than relying on the one from the system property.
     *

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>Important note:</b> the primary goal of this benchmark is to ensure that varying {@code
 * whereToDiffer} produces no observable change in performance. We want to make sure that the array
 * equals implementation is *not* short-circuiting to prevent timing-based attacks. Being fast is
 * only a secondary goal.
 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */
public class HashCodeBenchmark {

 *   <li>We need to be careful about how we suppress {@code suite()} methods in {@code common.io}.
 *       The generated suite for {@code FooTest} ends up containing {@code FooTest} itself plus some
 *       other tests. We want to exclude the other tests (which Android can't handle) while
 *       continuing to run {@code FooTest} itself. This is exactly what happens with {@code

   * behavior of futures so that you can contrast the next test with it.
   */
  public void testRegularFutureInterrupted() throws ExecutionException {

    /*
     * Here's the order of events that we want.
     *
     * 1. The client thread begins to block on a get() call to a future.
     * 2. The client thread is interrupted sometime before the result would be
     *   available.