* I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which
 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.

 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which
 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.

  // TODO(b/192446998): Remove this override after tools understand nullness better.
  @CheckForNull
  public V put(K key, @ParametricNullness V value) {
    return super.put(key, value);
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override
  @SuppressWarnings("RedundantOverride") // b/192446478: RedundantOverride ignores some annotations.
  // TODO(b/192446998): Remove this override after tools understand nullness better.
  @CheckForNull

        () -> getUninterruptibly(delayedFuture, 500, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS));
    assertTrue(Thread.interrupted()); // clears the interrupt state, too

    assertFalse(sleeper.completed);
    assertTrue(getUninterruptibly(delayedFuture));

    assertTrue(Thread.interrupted()); // clears the interrupt state, too
    assertTrue(sleeper.completed);
  }

  private static class SleepingRunnable implements Runnable {
    final int millis;

  }

  /**
   * Creates a TimeLimiter instance using the given executor service to execute method calls.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> using a bounded executor may be counterproductive! If the thread pool fills
   * up, any time callers spend waiting for a thread may count toward their time limit, and in this
   * case the call may even time out before the target method is ever invoked.
   *

   *     be unique to the built instance of the ThreadFactory and will be assigned sequentially. For
   *     example, {@code "rpc-pool-%d"} will generate thread names like {@code "rpc-pool-0"}, {@code
   *     "rpc-pool-1"}, {@code "rpc-pool-2"}, etc.
   * @return this for the builder pattern
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public ThreadFactoryBuilder setNameFormat(String nameFormat) {

    // pool ID but a thread ID of 2.
    Thread thread2 = threadFactory.newThread(monitoredRunnable);
    checkThreadPoolName(thread2, 2);
    assertEquals(
        thread.getName().substring(0, thread.getName().lastIndexOf('-')),
        thread2.getName().substring(0, thread.getName().lastIndexOf('-')));

    // Building again should give us a different pool ID.

@RunWith(JUnit4.class)

public final class NetworkMutationTest {
  private static final int NUM_TRIALS = 5;
  private static final int NUM_NODES = 20;
  private static final int NUM_EDGES = 100;
  private static final int NODE_POOL_SIZE = 1000; // must be >> NUM_NODES

  @Test
  public void directedNetwork() {
    testNetworkMutation(NetworkBuilder.directed());
  }

  @Test
  public void undirectedNetwork() {

            .suppressing(parentBuilder.getSuppressedTests())
            .suppressing(SetCreationTester.class.getMethods())
            // BiMap.entrySet() duplicate-handling behavior is too confusing for SetCreationTester
            .withSetUp(parentBuilder.getSetUp())
            .withTearDown(parentBuilder.getTearDown())
            .createTestSuite());
    /*

      assertThat(unsignedValue.toString()).isEqualTo(unsignedValue.bigIntegerValue().toString());
    }
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // too slow
  public void testToStringRadix() {
    for (int radix = Character.MIN_RADIX; radix <= Character.MAX_RADIX; radix++) {
      for (int l : TEST_INTS) {
        UnsignedInteger value = UnsignedInteger.fromIntBits(l);