* safe range. If {@code safeMax < safeMin} then no code points are considered safe.
   *
   * <p>If a code point has no mapped replacement then it is checked against the safe range. If it
   * lies outside that, then {@link #escapeUnsafe} is called, otherwise no escaping is performed.
   *
   * @param replacementMap a map of characters to their escaped representations

/**
 * @author David Beaumont
 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public class ArrayBasedCharEscaperTest extends TestCase {
  private static final ImmutableMap<Character, String> NO_REPLACEMENTS = ImmutableMap.of();
  private static final ImmutableMap<Character, String> SIMPLE_REPLACEMENTS =
      ImmutableMap.of(
          '\n', "<newline>",
          '\t', "<tab>",
          '&', "<and>");

    checkHelperVersion(NO_ATOMIC_FIELD_UPDATER, "SynchronizedAtomicHelper");

    // Run the corresponding FuturesTest test method in a new classloader that disallows
    // certain core jdk classes.
    ClassLoader oldClassLoader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();
    Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(NO_ATOMIC_FIELD_UPDATER);
    try {
      runTestMethod(NO_ATOMIC_FIELD_UPDATER);

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

   */
  @CheckForNull @VisibleForTesting transient long[] links;

  /** Pointer to the first node in the linked list, or {@code ENDPOINT} if there are no entries. */
  private transient int firstEntry;

  /** Pointer to the last node in the linked list, or {@code ENDPOINT} if there are no entries. */
  private transient int lastEntry;

  private final boolean accessOrder;

  CompactLinkedHashMap() {

   * I/O resource, it should generally be safe in the case of a resource that's being used only for
   * reading, such as an {@code InputStream}. Unlike with writable resources, there's no chance that
   * a failure that occurs when closing the stream indicates a meaningful problem such as a failure
   * to flush all bytes to the underlying resource.
   *

@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public interface LoadingCache<K, V> extends Cache<K, V>, Function<K, V> {

  /**
   * Returns the value associated with {@code key} in this cache, first loading that value if
   * necessary. No observable state associated with this cache is modified until loading completes.
   *
   * <p>If another call to {@link #get} or {@link #getUnchecked} is currently loading the value for

   *
   * <p>The implementation deviates from the {@code ExecutorService} specification with regards to
   * the {@code shutdownNow} method. First, "best-effort" with regards to canceling running tasks is
   * implemented as "no-effort". No interrupts or other attempts are made to stop threads executing
   * tasks. Second, the returned list will always be empty, as any submitted task is considered to