Search Options

Results per page
Sort
Preferred Languages
Advance

Results 1 - 10 of 97 for DO (0.19 sec)

  1. guava-testlib/src/com/google/common/collect/testing/testers/CollectionAddAllTester.java

       * Returns the {@link Method} instance for {@link #testAddAll_nullUnsupported()} so that tests can
       * suppress it with {@code FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} until <a
       * href="http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5045147">Sun bug 5045147</a> is fixed.
       */
      @J2ktIncompatible
      @GwtIncompatible // reflection
      public static Method getAddAllNullUnsupportedMethod() {
    Java
    - Registered: Fri Apr 26 12:43:10 GMT 2024
    - Last Modified: Wed Feb 21 16:49:06 GMT 2024
    - 7.7K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  2. CONTRIBUTING.md

         file).
      3. Files should be formatted according to Google's [Java style guide][].
      4. Please squash all commits for a change into a single commit (this can be
         done using `git rebase -i`). Do your best to have a
         [well-formed commit message][] for the change.
    
    [Java style guide]: https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html
    Plain Text
    - Registered: Fri May 03 12:43:13 GMT 2024
    - Last Modified: Fri Nov 17 18:47:47 GMT 2023
    - 3.7K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  3. android/guava/src/com/google/common/collect/EnumBiMap.java

       * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields
       * themselves their proper values under GWT, since GWT's EnumMap does need the Class instance.
       *
       * Note that sometimes these fields *do* have correct values under J2CL: They will if the caller
       * calls `create(Foo.class)`, rather than `create(map)`. That's fine; we just shouldn't rely on
    Java
    - Registered: Fri May 03 12:43:13 GMT 2024
    - Last Modified: Thu Aug 24 01:40:03 GMT 2023
    - 6.3K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  4. android/guava-testlib/src/com/google/common/collect/testing/MinimalIterable.java

      private MinimalIterable(Iterator<E> iterator) {
        this.iterator = iterator;
      }
    
      @Override
      public Iterator<E> iterator() {
        if (iterator == null) {
          // TODO: throw something else? Do we worry that people's code and tests
          // might be relying on this particular type of exception?
          throw new IllegalStateException();
        }
        try {
          return iterator;
        } finally {
    Java
    - Registered: Fri May 03 12:43:13 GMT 2024
    - Last Modified: Wed Feb 21 16:49:06 GMT 2024
    - 3.2K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  5. guava/src/com/google/common/collect/AbstractSortedMultiset.java

    /**
     * This class provides a skeletal implementation of the {@link SortedMultiset} interface.
     *
     * <p>The {@link #count} and {@link #size} implementations all iterate across the set returned by
     * {@link Multiset#entrySet()}, as do many methods acting on the set returned by {@link
     * #elementSet()}. Override those methods for better performance.
     *
     * @author Louis Wasserman
     */
    @GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
    @ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
    Java
    - Registered: Fri Apr 05 12:43:09 GMT 2024
    - Last Modified: Mon Jun 26 21:02:13 GMT 2023
    - 4.6K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  6. guava-tests/test/com/google/common/util/concurrent/CallablesTest.java

              @Override
              public void checkAccess(Thread t) {
                throw new SecurityException();
              }
    
              @Override
              public void checkPermission(Permission perm) {
                // Do nothing so we can clear the security manager at the end
              }
            });
        try {
          final String oldName = Thread.currentThread().getName();
    Java
    - Registered: Fri Apr 12 12:43:09 GMT 2024
    - Last Modified: Tue Feb 13 14:28:25 GMT 2024
    - 5.4K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  7. guava-tests/test/com/google/common/io/FilesCreateTempDirTest.java

         * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
         * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at
         * least old versions), so we mostly do. This is useful because we don't actually run our CI on
         * Windows under Java 8, at least as of this writing.
         *
         * Under Windows in particular, we want to test that:
         *
    Java
    - Registered: Fri Apr 19 12:43:09 GMT 2024
    - Last Modified: Fri Oct 06 17:11:11 GMT 2023
    - 4.3K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  8. android/guava-testlib/pom.xml

          <!-- *not* <scope>test</scope>; <scope>compile</scope> is right so that guava-testlib users get junit transitively. -->
          <version>4.13.2</version>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
          <!--
          Do not include Truth in non-test scope! Doing so creates a problematic dependency cycle.
          -->
          <groupId>com.google.truth</groupId>
          <artifactId>truth</artifactId>
          <version>${truth.version}</version>
    XML
    - Registered: Fri May 03 12:43:13 GMT 2024
    - Last Modified: Mon Jul 31 18:55:22 GMT 2023
    - 3.1K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  9. guava-tests/test/com/google/common/base/AndroidIncompatible.java

     *       that we could probably work around. Or we could manually strip the test from open-source
     *       Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would
     *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
     *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
    Java
    - Registered: Fri Apr 19 12:43:09 GMT 2024
    - Last Modified: Fri Jul 07 15:40:13 GMT 2023
    - 3.9K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
  10. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_enhancement_request.yaml

          description: Which existing classes or methods do you want to improve?
          placeholder: e.g., `com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList::of`
          render: java
        validations:
          required: true
    
      - type: textarea
        attributes:
          label: How do you want it to be improved?
        validations:
          required: true
    
      - type: textarea
        attributes:
          label: Why do we need it to be improved?
        validations:
    Others
    - Registered: Fri May 03 12:43:13 GMT 2024
    - Last Modified: Fri Nov 17 18:47:47 GMT 2023
    - 3.9K bytes
    - Viewed (0)
Back to top