<c:if test="${eoled}">
								<li class="nav-item" data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="left" title="<la:message key="labels.eol_error" />">
									<a class="nav-link active" href="${eolLink}" target="_olh"><em class="fas fa-times-circle text-danger"></a>
								</li>
							</c:if>
							<c:if test="${developmentMode}">
								<li class="nav-item" data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="left"

        Guava's main yardstick for evaluating proposed features can be summed up as [utility times
        ubiquity](https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/PhilosophyExplained#utility-times-ubiquity).


        #### Utility: compare with alternatives


        There is always *some* alternative to adding a new feature to Guava, even if it's just

							<c:if test="${eoled}">
								<li class="nav-item" data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="left" title="<la:message key="labels.eol_error" />">
									<a class="nav-link active" href="${eolLink}" target="_olh"><em class="fas fa-times-circle text-danger"></a>
								</li>
							</c:if>
							<c:if test="${developmentMode}">
								<li class="nav-item" data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="left"