*       that we could probably work around. Or we could manually strip the test from open-source
 *       Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would
 *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?

   *       2001:db8::1}
   * </ul>
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the specifier is not valid.
   */
  public static HostSpecifier fromValid(String specifier) {
    // Verify that no port was specified, and strip optional brackets from
    // IPv6 literals.
    HostAndPort parsedHost = HostAndPort.fromString(specifier);
    Preconditions.checkArgument(!parsedHost.hasPort());
    String host = parsedHost.getHost();

import junit.framework.TestSuite;

/**
 * Unit test for {@link Resources}.
 *
 * @author Chris Nokleberg
 */

public class ResourcesTest extends IoTestCase {

  @AndroidIncompatible // wouldn't run anyway, but strip the source entirely because of b/230620681
  public static TestSuite suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
    suite.addTest(
        ByteSourceTester.tests(

 *       that we could probably work around. Or we could manually strip the test from open-source
 *       Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would
 *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?

   * PackageSanityTests. (The test would run on the JVM, too, if not for the suppression below, and
   * that would be a problem because it violates small-test rules. Note that we strip the
   * suppression externally, but it's OK because we don't enforce test-size rules there.)
   *
   * We'd just use PackageSanityTests directly, saving us from needing this separate type, but we're

   * PackageSanityTests. (The test would run on the JVM, too, if not for the suppression below, and
   * that would be a problem because it violates small-test rules. Note that we strip the
   * suppression externally, but it's OK because we don't enforce test-size rules there.)
   *
   * We'd just use PackageSanityTests directly, saving us from needing this separate type, but we're

  public void testStart_failed() {
    final Exception exception = new Exception("deliberate");
    TestService service =
        new TestService() {
          @Override
          protected void startUp() throws Exception {
            super.startUp();
            throw exception;
          }
        };
    assertEquals(0, service.startUpCalled);
    RuntimeException e =

  public void testStart_failed() {
    final Exception exception = new Exception("deliberate");
    TestService service =
        new TestService() {
          @Override
          protected void startUp() throws Exception {
            super.startUp();
            throw exception;
          }
        };
    assertEquals(0, service.startUpCalled);
    RuntimeException e =

        if (Constants.DEFAULT_FIELD.equals(field)) {
            final String text = wildcardQuery.getTerm().text();
            context.addFieldLog(field, text);
            context.addHighlightedQuery(StringUtils.strip(text, "*"));
            return buildDefaultQueryBuilder(fessConfig, context,
                    (f, b) -> QueryBuilders.wildcardQuery(f, toLowercaseWildcard(text)).boost(b * boost));
        }

import org.apache.catalina.Container;
import org.apache.catalina.Context;
import org.apache.catalina.Host;
import org.apache.catalina.connector.Connector;
import org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost;
import org.apache.catalina.startup.Tomcat;
import org.apache.tomcat.util.http.CookieProcessorBase;
import org.apache.tomcat.util.http.Rfc6265CookieProcessor;
import org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SSLHostConfig;
import org.codelibs.core.lang.StringUtil;