* to test it.
       */
      return;
    }

    /*
     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based
     * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which
 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might suggest to users that the test is suppressed

    return Helpers.mapEntry(key, value);
  }

  @Override
  protected void expectContents(Collection<Entry<K, V>> expected) {
    // TODO: move this to invariant checks once the appropriate hook exists?
    super.expectContents(expected);
    for (Entry<K, V> entry : expected) {
      assertEquals(
          "Wrong value for key " + entry.getKey(), entry.getValue(), getMap().get(entry.getKey()));
    }
  }

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which
 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might suggest to users that the test is suppressed

    if (localInputFuture != null) {
      String message = "inputFuture=[" + localInputFuture + "]";
      if (localTimer != null) {
        long delay = localTimer.getDelay(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
        // Negative delays look confusing in an error message
        if (delay > 0) {
          message += ", remaining delay=[" + delay + " ms]";
        }
      }
      return message;
    }
    return null;
  }

  @Override

    return Helpers.mapEntry(key, value);
  }

  @Override
  protected void expectContents(Collection<Entry<K, V>> expected) {
    // TODO: move this to invariant checks once the appropriate hook exists?
    super.expectContents(expected);
    for (Entry<K, V> entry : expected) {
      assertEquals(
          "Wrong value for key " + entry.getKey(), entry.getValue(), getMap().get(entry.getKey()));
    }
  }

import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * A mapping from disjoint nonempty ranges to non-null values. Queries look up the value associated
 * with the range (if any) that contains a specified key.
 *
 * <p>In contrast to {@link RangeSet}, no "coalescing" is done of {@linkplain

       * to test it.
       */
      return;
    }

    /*
     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based
     * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at

 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and
 * `-android` "flavors.")
 *
 * (We could consider releasing a listenablefuture:1.0.1 someday. But we would want to look into how
 * that affects users, especially users of the Android Gradle Plugin, since the plugin developers
 * put in a special hack for us: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/131431257)
 */

   * its input unmodified. Provided that the test suite is built without {@link
   * com.google.common.collect.testing.features.CollectionFeature#KNOWN_ORDER}, the tests will look
   * only at the returned contents without regard for order.
   */
  Iterable<E> order(List<E> insertionOrder);