* second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *

  /**
   * Returns the result of applying this predicate to {@code input} (Java 8+ users, see notes in the
   * class documentation above). This method is <i>generally expected</i>, but not absolutely
   * required, to have the following properties:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>Its execution does not cause any observable side effects.
   *   <li>The computation is <i>consistent with equals</i>; that is, {@link Objects#equal

  /**
   * Creates an {@code ImmutableMap} backed by a JDK HashMap. Used when probable hash flooding is
   * detected. This implementation may replace the entries in entryArray with its own entry objects
   * (though they will have the same key/value contents), and will take ownership of entryArray.
   */
  static <K, V> ImmutableMap<K, V> create(
      int n, @Nullable Entry<K, V>[] entryArray, boolean throwIfDuplicateKeys) {

    // Test default state of not started.
    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());
    assertFalse(task.isDone());
    assertFalse(task.isCancelled());

    // Start the task to put it in the RUNNING state.  Have to use a separate
    // thread because the task will block on the task latch after unblocking
    // the run latch.
    exec.execute(task);
    runLatch.await();
    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());

 *       Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would
 *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?
 *   <li>While a dependency on Android ought to be easy if it's for annotations only, it will

    return C2 * Integer.rotateLeft(hashCode * C1, 15);
  }

  private boolean checkFilter(int c) {
    return 1 == (1 & (filter >> c));
  }

  // This is all essentially copied from ImmutableSet, but we have to duplicate because
  // of dependencies.

  // Represents how tightly we can pack things, as a maximum.
  private static final double DESIRED_LOAD_FACTOR = 0.5;

  /**

        out.write(b[i]);
      }
    } else {
      out.write(b, off, len);
    }
    out.flush(); // for coverage
  }

  // TODO(chrisn): only works if we ensure we have crossed file threshold

  public void testWriteErrorAfterClose() throws Exception {
    byte[] data = newPreFilledByteArray(100);
    FileBackedOutputStream out = new FileBackedOutputStream(50);

    testers.add(ListSubListTester.class);
    testers.add(ListToArrayTester.class);
    return testers;
  }

  /**
   * Specifies {@link CollectionFeature#KNOWN_ORDER} for all list tests, since lists have an
   * iteration ordering corresponding to the insertion order.
   */
  @Override
  public TestSuite createTestSuite() {
    withFeatures(KNOWN_ORDER);
    return super.createTestSuite();
  }

  @Override

    suite.addTest(
        MapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestTypeToInstanceMapGenerator() {
                  // Other tests will verify what real, warning-free usage looks like
                  // but here we have to do some serious fudging
                  @Override
                  @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})
                  public Map<TypeToken, Object> create(Object... elements) {

   * themselves their proper values under GWT, since GWT's EnumMap does need the Class instance.
   *
   * Note that sometimes these fields *do* have correct values under J2CL: They will if the caller
   * calls `create(Foo.class)`, rather than `create(map)`. That's fine; we just shouldn't rely on
   * it.
   */
  transient Class<K> keyTypeOrObjectUnderJ2cl;